Image by Unsplash
The Trump administration is facing an unprecedented crisis after it was revealed that senior national security officials shared details about military strikes and war plans in Yemen through a group chat on the Signal app, in which he participated. the editor-in-chief of The AtlanticThis incident has alarmed both the United States and the international community and raises serious concerns about operational security and the Trump administration's handling of sensitive information.
A Leak That Shakes Washington
War plans related to airstrikes in Yemen were discussed in a Signal group that somehow included the editor of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg.
According to The AtlanticThe messages contained detailed operational information about impending attacks against the Houthis, a militant group that has been attacking vessels in the Red Sea since November 2023. The leaked details included specific targets, the weapons to be used, and the sequence of the attacks. While it is unclear whether this information was classified, its sensitive nature is undeniable, as its disclosure could compromise the safety of troops and the effectiveness of military operations.
The National Security Council confirmed that the chat "appears to be authentic," intensifying criticism. Just two hours after Goldberg received the messages, the United States launched a series of airstrikes against Houthi targets in Yemen, suggesting the information was accurate and up-to-date.
Key Figures in the Scandal
The Signal group included prominent Trump administration figures: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz. who allegedly invited Goldberg to the chat. The presence of a journalist in such a sensitive conversation has sparked speculation about how this error occurred and who is responsible.
In his initial remarks, Hegseth called Goldberg “deceitful” and denied that “war plans” had been shared, though he did not explain why Signal was used or how the editor ended up in the group. Meanwhile, Trump initially claimed to be unaware of the incident, but later downplayed it, calling it “the only slip-up in two months” of his administration.
Political Reactions and Consequences
The leak sparked a wave of reactions. Democrats like Senator Chuck Schumer and Representative Jim Himes called the incident one of the worst military security breaches in decades, demanding thorough investigations. Even some Republicans, like Senator Roger Wicker, expressed concern and promised to review the case in a bipartisan manner. However, House Speaker Mike Johnson took a more lenient stance, defending those involved.
Using Signal, an encrypted but unclassified messaging app, is also under scrutiny. While it's more secure than conventional texting, experts warn that it's not designed to handle highly sensitive information, highlighting a potential sloppiness in communication protocols.
National Security at Risk
This scandal comes at a time when Hegseth's office had announced strict measures against leaks, including the use of polygraph tests.
The incident also reveals internal tensions. In the chat, Vance questioned the appropriateness of airstrikes, arguing that they could raise oil prices and benefit Europe more than the United States.
A Call for Transparency
The leak of war plans in a chat with a journalist is not only a security breach, but a stark reminder of the strict protocols that governments must follow. While the National Security Council investigates how this error occurred, the public deserves clear answers about how sensitive information will be protected in the future.
Stay informed with More Latin for more updates on this developing story.
Fountain: Associated Press
English 
Spanish